Thursday, December 27, 2007

William Shakespeare's Hamlet




William Shakespeare’s Hamlet
Begin: 12/12/07
End: 12/20/07
Quality: Ten out of Ten.
Reason: Reading Plan.
Genre: Classics. Drama.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1602.
Fog Index: 8.0/86% are harder.
Flesch Index: 72.8/86% are harder.
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 5.7/88% are harder.
Complex Words: 9%/76% have more.
Number: Numerous.
Synopsis: Who doesn’t know this story? Hamlet’s father gets murdered by his brother and then said brother marries Hamlet’s mom, Queen Gertrude. Hamlet’s dad comes back as a ghost to let Hamlet know and demands Hamlet extract revenge. A million speeches later, Hamlet does it but also dies.
Thoughts: Bad Ass. Really bad ass. I forgot how much I liked this play. It really is the best of what Shakespeare has to offer. Some of Hamelt’s speeches are just so damn close to how I have felt or feel. It’s amazing. And the beautiful tragedy of it all. Amazing.

Ernest Hemingway's A Farewell to Arms



Ernest Hemingway’s Farewell to Arms
Begin: 12/11/07
End: 12/22/07
Quality: Two out of Ten.
Reason: Reading Plan.
Genre: American Literature, War Novel.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1929.
Fog Index: N/A
Flesch Index: N/A
Flesch-Kincaid Index: N/A
Complex Words: N/A
Number: First.
Synopsis: Well, this story not only tells of Henry’s experiences as an ambulance driver in Italy during World War One but also his relationship with Catherine.
Thoughts: You know, I have always enjoyed Hemingway. I have only read a handful of his books but I have liked them all. This one I really detested. It didn’t really seem to go anywhere, other than the fact that war was bad. I also couldn’t stand the treatment of Catherine. She just didn’t seem to have any personality apart from her relations with Henry. I wanted to shake her. She is supposed to represent Hemingway’s ideal women. I have a much greater understanding for his chauvinist bullshit now. I had a hard time getting through it just because it all seemed so pointless and futile.

Some Quotes.

“There, darling. Now you’re all clean inside and out. Tell me. How many people have you ever loved?”
“Nobody.”
“Not even me?”
“Yes, you.”
“How many others really?”
“None.”
“How many have you—how do you say it?—stayed with?”
“None.”
“You’re lying to me.”
“Yes.”
“It’s all right. Keep right on lying to me. That’s what I want you to do. Were they pretty?”

Can I puke now? I mean really? Ideal women? How about a subservient robot without any spine or thoughts of her own?

"I had seen nothing sacred, and the things that were glorious had no glory and the sacrifices were like the stockyards at Chicago if nothing was done with the meat except to bury it. There were many words that you could not stand to hear and finally only the names of places had dignity. Certain numbers were the same way and certain dates and these with the names of the places were all you could say and have them mean anything. Abstract words such as glory, honor, courage, or hallow were obscene beside the concrete names of villages, the numbers of roads, the names of rivers, the numbers of regiments and the dates."

"But we were never lonely and never afraid when we were together. I know that the night is not the same as the day: that all things are different, that the things of the night cannot be explained in the day, because they do not then exist, and the night can be a dreadful time for lonely people once their loneliness has started. But with Catherine there was almost no difference in the night except that it was an even better time. If people bring so much courage to this world the world has to kill them to break them, so of course it kills them. The world breaks every one and afterward many are strong at the broken places. But those that will not break it kills. It kills the very good and the very gentle and the very brave impartially. If you are none of these you can be sure it will kill you too but there will be no special hurry."

Andrew Weil's Healthy Aging



Andrew Weil’s Healthy Aging
Begin: 12/20/07
End: 12/25/07
Quality: Seven out of Ten.
Reason: Unread.
Genre: Nutrition. Health.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 2005.
Fog Index: N/A
Flesch Index: N/A
Flesch-Kincaid Index: N/A
Complex Words: N/A
Number: First.
Synopsis: This book basically purports to explain ways in which to age gracefully. Dr. Weil is very opposed to the idea that we can stop or prevent aging but he does suggest ways in which we can make our lives as healthy as possible as we age.
Thoughts: It was pretty good. I mean nothing that I have not read about before. I especially liked his ideas of aging gracefully and his condemnation of the anti-aging industry.

Thursday, December 13, 2007

Samuel Beckett's Endgame



Samuel Beckett's Endgame
Begin: 12/11/07
End: 12/12/07
Quality: Three out of Ten.
Reason: Modern Drama.
Genre: Drama. Irish Literature.
Original Language: French.
Date of Publication: 1957.
Fog Index: 4.7/98% are harder.
Flesch Index: 89.7/99% are harder.
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 2.5/99% are harder.
Complex Words: 5%/95% have more.
Number: First.
Synopsis: Hamm and Clov, are a master and servant stuck in this tiny house, there doesn’t seem to be anything outside of the house. Did I mention that Hamm’s parents live in garbage cans? Hamm and Clov are dependent on each other and seem to have an intense love/hate relationship.
Thoughts: Weird. I don’t think I got it. I liked it to a certain extent. I felt that it was a attempt to explore existential angst and exploring modern relationships in a metaphorical manner but I could just be making that up. Maybe the whole point is seeing your own ideas in it.

Anne Karpf's The Human Voice



Anne Karpf's The Human Voice
Begin: 11/28/07
End: 12/10/07
Quality: Ten out of Ten.
Reason: Unread.
Genre: Popular Science. Non-Fiction.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 2007.
Fog Index: N/A
Flesch Index: N/A
Flesch-Kincaid Index: N/A
Complex Words: N/A
Number: First.
Synopsis: This book is basically about the human voice, about how it develops, how we use it and how it effects our everyday world and our relationships, among many other facets.
Thoughts: Amazing! I really loved this book. It was really enlightening. It made me think a lot more about not only my voice but other people’s voices and now I find myself paying a lot more attention to how people are saying things as well as what they are saying. I also found myself thinking a lot about the Bene Gesserit voice but that’s another topic for another time. This is one of those books that I want everyone to read.

Thursday, November 29, 2007

Beowulf



Beowulf
Begin: 11/27/07
End: 11/29/07
Quality: Eight out of Ten.
Reason: Unread.
Genre: Epics. World Literature. Saxon Literature.
Original Language: Old English.
Date of Publication: 1010.
Fog Index: 11.5/63% are harder.
Flesch Index: 59.9/66% are harder.
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 10.2/52% are harder.
Complex Words: 7%/87% have more.
Number: Third?
Synopsis: King Hroogar builds this great hall but unfortunately the noise that he and his people make irritate the monster Grendel, who then comes and decimates many of them. Beowulf hears of this and comes to slay Grendel. Once this is accomplished, Grendel’s mother comes seeking vengeance. Once Beowulf kills her, he is hailed as a hero and returns to his own land. He eventually becomes King there and dies fighting a dragon.
Thoughts: Well, I bought this when I discovered that Neil Gaiman was working on the screenplay for a Beowulf movie. I didn’t actually read it until after seeing the movie. I remember watching the movie and remember the plot when I read it in college and then they completely alter it. I wanted to see exactly what the text said. And so I read it.

I thought it was very good. I got the Seamus Heaney translation. It was a very quick read. The only real issue that I had with it, due to my very modern sentiments, was that I wish that there was more descriptions of the monsters. I don’t really know what else to say about it so I guess I’ll end here.

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Lillian Hellman's The Children's Hour


Lilian Hellman’s The Children’s Hour
Begin: 11/26/07
End: 11/27/07
Quality: Nine out of Ten.
Reason: Unread. Modern Drama.
Genre: Drama.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1934.
Fog Index: 6.2/94% are harder.
Flesch Index: 78.8%/94% are harder.
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 4.8/94% are harder.
Complex Words: 5%/94% have more.
Number: First.
Synopsis: Two women run a school for girls. A disgruntled student run away from school to her grandmother and concots a story about the two women having a lesbian affair. The story destroys the lives of the women.
Thoughts: It was really good! I kept thinking that some homophobia was going to creep it but it was strangely absent. It was a very sad play and I just wanted to beat the crap out of Mary and thinking that perhaps she would redeem herself at some point. A very good play, I must say.

Monday, November 26, 2007

Katharine Dunn's Geek Love


Katherine Dunn’s Geek Love
Begin: 11/19/07
End: 11/27/07
Quality: Eight out of Ten.
Reason: Unread. Jeremy Recommended.
Genre: Fiction. Contemporary Fiction.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1989.
Fog Index: 7.6/88% are harder.
Flesch Index: 74.9%/89% are harder.
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 5.9/87% are harder.
Complex Words: 7%/89% have more.
Number: First.
Synopsis: It is basically two stories. We have the story of our narrator’s childhood, growing up in a traveling circus where her parents have attempted to create freaks in their children by using drugs and radiation. The second story takes place in the present time with the narrator and her taking care of both her daughter and her mother, unbeknownst to them.
Thoughts: I really liked it overall. I mean it was pretty perverse and bizarre but that is the kind of shit that I really like. I thought that the story that takes place in the modern day was weak. It was not at all what I expected it to be. When I first had heard about it, I thought it was going to be the story of two geeks falling in love rather than about a family carnival business. Then when I started reading it, I was not at all prepared for the deviousness of Arturo or the love that Oly seemed to have for him despite all of the bullshit that he was doing. Overall, though, a really good story.

Monday, November 19, 2007

Brian Herbert and Kevin Anderson's Sandworms of Dune




Brian Herbert and Kevin Anderson’s Sandworms of Dune
Begin: 11/16/07
End: 11/18/07
Quality: Two out of Ten.
Reason: Dune Cycle.
Genre: Science Fiction. Pop Fiction.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 2007.
Fog Index: 10.4/71% are harder.
Flesch Index: 60.6%/67 are harder.
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 7.9/73% are harder.
Complex Words: 13/55% have more.
Number: First.
Synopsis: This is basically the conclusion of the dune sage. Drama on the no-ship. Murbella is trying to band humanity together to defeat the thinking machines. The Face dancers under Khrone have some conspiracy in the works. And Omninus is relentless is his pursuit of humanity.
Thoughts: Basically, it sucked. It’s your standard pop science fiction pile of dribble. I read it because it’s the finishing book of the dune cycle but I can’t believe that this was the plot that Frank Herbert, my beloved Frank Herbert, wrote. It was so bad and contrived and stupid.

Friday, November 16, 2007


Toni Morrison's Paradise
Begin: 11/8/07
End: 11/16/07
Quality: Nine out of Ten.
Reason: Reading Plan.
Genre: Fiction.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1989.
Fog Index: 9.4/78% are harder.
Flesch Index: 69.8%/82% are harder.
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 7.4/77% are harder.
Complex Words: 8%/82% have more.
Number: First.
Synopsis: Dual stories going on in this book. We have the story of Ruby, Oklahoma, a all black town which is starting to have various issues. Then there is the story of the Convent, which is a few miles outside of town and while once a convent school is now a refuge for various women.
Thoughts:


Why does Toni Morrison mesmerize me like she does? Hmm? I am not sure why or how but I find myself so completely and utterly swept away by her lyricism and the magical quality of the worlds which she creates. Paradise is no exception to this. It is not the easiest book in the world to read. The first time that I read it, I was pretty lost. I think I have a better grasp on it but I know that there is still a lot in that book that I still need to discover and reflect on. And maybe that is why I am so into Toni Morrison because she writes books that have to be grappled, like Jacob and the Angel and afterwards you are granted a boon of wisdom. Her books aren’t just mindless entertainment. They are mysteries to be unraveled, they are to be marinated in your mind for weeks and months and years and to go back to again and again.

Paradise is her hardest novel, at least for me, and it is the one that reminds me the most of Faulkner. The amount of characters, the way in which she describes the action of the novel, the mystery of who exactly is the white girl in the convent who dies, the sheer size and complexity which she creates, it all combines to make this not a tough book to get through but just one that is very difficult to get your mind around.

I guess I should start by talking about that white girl. This is how the novel opens…“They shoot the white girl first. With the rest they can take their time. No need to hurry out here. They are seventeen miles from a town which has ninety miles between it and any other. Hiding places will be plentiful in the Convent, but there is time and the day has just begun. (3) The first time that I read this book, I spend too much time trying to figure out who exactly the white girl is but I believe that Toni Morrison does not want us to know. And she is very good about avoiding mention of race. And I think one of the main points of this novel is that it really does not matter. We get to know these women inside and out so dos it even matter what color their skin is? Does it really matter at all after their full stories are revealed?

My main problem with the novel was just the sheer complexity of it. I felt like it needed to come with it’s own genealogy chart so I could get a handle on the people of Ruby. Maybe that will be the project for the next time that I read this book.

Another problem that I have is that I see so much in this novel that I cannot fully articulate. It is going to have to marinate for a while longer, maybe the next time that I read it, I will be able to talk about it more.

I did love this book. I can say that without a doubt. It may not be my favorite by Morrison but its still pretty fucking good, even though it is a mind-fuck. It’s the kind of book I want to suck the nectar out of, that I want to ingest and contemplate for a long time.

“She had to stop nursing resentment at the townspeople’s refusal of her services; stop stealing penny revenge by ignoring what was going on and letting evil has its way. Playing blind was to avoid the language God spoke in. He did not thunder instructions or whisper messages into ears. Oh, no. He was a liberating God. A teacher who taught you how to learn, to see for yourself. His signs were clear, abundantly so, if you stopped steeping in vanity’s sour juice and paid attention to His world.” (273)

I saw a lot of patriarchal vs. matriarchal issues in this novel. This might be due to my own beliefs and ideology.

“They shoot the white girl first. With the rest they can take their time. No need to hurry out here. They are seventeen miles from a town which has ninety miles between it and any other. Hiding places will be plentiful in the Convent, but there is time and the day has just begun. (3)

That is how this novel opens up. The “New Fathers” of Ruby, an all black town in Oklahoma, go to the convent because they feel that somehow the woman at the covent are causing the decay they see occurring in Ruby.

“The chill intensifies as the men spread deeper into the mansion, taking their time, looking, listening, alert to the female malice that hides here and the yeast-and-butter smell of rising dough.” (4)

“How exquisitely human was the wish for permanent happiness, and how thin human imagination became trying to achieve it. Soon Ruby will be like ant other country town: the young thinking of elsewhere; the old full of regret. The sermons will be eloquent but fewer and fewer will pay attention or connect them to everyday life. How they can hold it together, he wondered, this hard-won heaven defined only by the absence of the unsaved, the unworthy and the strange? Who will protect them from their leaders?” (306)

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

William Shakespeare's Love's Labour Lost



William Shakespeare’s Love Labour’s Lost
Begin: 11/06/07
End: 11/13/07
Quality: Four out of Ten.
Reason: Reading Plan.
Genre: Classics. Drama. Shakespeare’s Comedies.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1623.
Fog Index: N/A
Flesch Index: N/A
Flesch-Kincaid Index: N/A
Complex Words: N/A
Number: First?
Synopsis: Well, it starts with the King and his men vowing to study for three years and not see any woman at all. He is reminded that the princess and her ladies are coming soon. The king has them live in a field outside the castle. Of course, the king and his men fall in love with the princess and he ladies and comedy ensues.
Thoughts: Well, I was kinda lost with this play. I had a hard time getting a hang of it. I don’t even know what to say about it. The ending was also very odd, indeed, with the king dying and the women running off without marriage.

Our wooing doth not end like an old play;/ Jack hath not Jill: these ladies' courtesy/ Might well have made our sport a comedy" (V.ii.867-9).

Friday, November 9, 2007

Dana Gioia's Can Poetry Matter?


Dana Gioia’s Can Poetry Matter?
Begin: 11/06/07
End: 11/09/07
Quality: Four out of Ten.
Reason: Unread.
Genre: Non-Fiction, Literary Criticism. Essays.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1992.
Fog Index: N/A
Flesch Index: N/A
Flesch-Kincaid Index: N/A
Complex Words: N/A
Number: First
Synopsis: This is actually a collection of essays concerning poetry and the state of poetry today.
Thoughts: Well, I really liked the first essay, “Can Poetry Matter?” quite a bit. I thought it was well written, engaging and productive. Gioia not only critics the state of modern poetry but he comes up with solutions to work out the problems. I also liked some of the other essays but towards the end, I found myself really not giving a damn. I am not sure if it was because I was tired or what but there you have it.

Wednesday, November 7, 2007

Dorothy Allison's Trash





Dorothy Allison’s Trash:Stories
Begin: 11/06/07
End: 11/08/07
Quality: Six out of Ten.
Reason: Unread.
Genre: Fiction. Short Stories. Southern Literature.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1988.
Fog Index: 7.4/87% are harder.
Flesch Index: 76.5/92% are harder.
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 5.9/86% are harder.
Complex Words: 5%/91% are harder.
Number: First
Synopsis: This is a collection of short stories by Dorothy Allison which span from stories of growing up in the south to her relationships with various lovers.
Thoughts: The first story of this collection, “River of Names”, was so horrifyingly depressing, so morbid and morose, that it even made me uncomfortable and that is a feat, ladies and gentlemen, that not many people can accomplish. Let’s not forget how much time I spend reading Toni Morrison. Something about the constant litany of cousins who had been beaten, killed, raped, ect just overwhelmed me a little bit.

I ended up really enjoying the work. I always have a hard time with short stories. I am just not that into them. This was easier since they all seemed to be connected by the same and/or similar narrator. The stories that I especially liked were “A lesbian appetite”, “Muscles of the Mind” and “Don’t tell me you don’t know”.

The first portion of the stories are mainly about growing up, Allison then seems to mainly concentrate of being a young lesbian. I did like the lesbian stories quite a bit. I really started to like the stories with “Don’t tell me you don’t know.”



“The problem is…”I told them, checking first to be sure the door was locked. “The proble is that I don’t love her. I want to love her. I want to love somebody. I want to go crazy with love, eat myself up with love. Starve myself, strangle and die with love, like everybody else. Like the rest of the whole goddamned world. I want to be like the rest of the world.” (90)

Monday, November 5, 2007

Marion Zimmer Bradley's Mists of Avalon





Marion Zimmer Bradley’s Mists of Avalon
Begin: 10/26/07
End: 11/05/07
Quality: Ten out of Ten.
Reason: Reading Plan.
Genre: Fiction. Fantasy. Feminist Retellings. Arthurian Literature. Women Studies.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1979.
Fog Index: 10.2/71% are harder.
Flesch Index: 72.2/86% are harder.
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 8.1/70% are harder.
Complex Words: 6%/91% are harder.
Number: Fourth?
Synopsis: Well, this is simply a feminist retelling of the Arthurian saga. It’s main points of reference are the women around Arthur but mainly Morgaine, his sister.
Thoughts: Fucking brilliant, just simply brilliant. I love this story. I mean it’s definitely Wiccan and feminist propaganda but I still love it, despite that. It’s such a heart breaking story as you watch these character do what is in their nature to do and watch as it makes them suffer. Brilliant. And I can’t tell you how much I would love to sit down and have tea and conversations with Talisien or Vivienne or Morgaine. I am just so in love. Or go and be schooled in Avalon. I thought it was weird that it seemed that both Igraine and Vivienne had been lovers of Uther in the past. And I guess that’s all I have to say. Oh, that and this is a perfect book for the Halloween season.

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Thich Nhat Hanh's The Heart of the Buddha's Teaching
Begin: 10/18/07
End: 10/27/07
Quality: Five out of Ten.
Reason: Unread. Random.
Genre: Religion. Buddhism. Zen Buddhism.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1998.
Fog Index: 11.6/60% are harder.
Flesch Index: 62/70% are harder.
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 8.7/64% are harder.
Complex Words: 13%/58% are harder.
Number: First.
Synopsis: This is Thick Nhat Hanh explaining the basic of Buddhist teachings.
Thoughts: Very good. I really liked quite a bit of it. My major problem was just that everything is so regimented. There was forever the eight fold path and then the 3 precious jewels and then the 6 paramitas.

Saturday, October 27, 2007

Sharon Kay Penman's Cruel as the Grave



Sharon Kay Penman’s Cruel as the Grave
Begin: 10/25/07
End: 10/26/07
Quality: Five out of Ten.
Reason: Unread. Random.
Genre: Historical Fiction. Mystery.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1998.
Fog Index: 8.7/82% are harder.
Flesch Index: 70.7/83% are harder.
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 6.8/81% are harder.
Complex Words: 8%/83% are harder.
Number: Second.
Synopsis: The story takes place in the spring on 1193. It is part of a series involving Justin De Quincy, the Queen’s Man. In this novel, De Quincy helps Eleanor defuse a political situation with her youngest son as well as solve the murder of a young welsh girl and has some drama with the Lady Claudine.
Thoughts: Horrible writing! Horrible! If it wasn’t for my love of Eleanor and the fact that it’s a really short novel, I totally wouldn’t have read it. I just felt that the writing was mediocre at best.

Thursday, October 25, 2007

Bertolt Brecht's Threepenny Opera




Begin: 10/24/07
End: 10/25/07
Quality: Four out of Ten.
Reason: Modern Drama
Genre: Drama. Modern Drama.
Original Language: German.
Date of Publication: 1928.
Fog Index: N/A
Flesch Index: N/A
Flesch-Kincaid Index: N/A
Complex Words:N/A.
Number: Second.
Synopsis: Machealth is a master criminal. He ends up marrying Mr. Peachum, the “King of Beggars”, daughter, Polly, who then wants him hanged for marrying his daughter behind his back. Mr. Peachum then tries to get Machealth hanged.
Thoughts: I really didn’t like it. I had to force myself to finish it. It just kept reminding me of Oliver and the characters and all the damn songs were annoying the shit out of me.

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Thorton Wilder's Our Town




Thorton Wilder's Our Town
Begin: 10/12/07
End: 10/21/07
Quality: Ten out of Ten.
Reason: Reading Plan.
Genre: Fiction. African-American Fiction. Literature.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1977.
Fog Index: N/A
Flesch Index: N/A
Flesch-Kincaid Index: N/A
Complex Words:N/A.
Number: A Few.
Synopsis: Well, it’s really quite a number of stories, now isn’t it. The main one is Milkman and his lack of identity but that doesn’t really do justice to the story, not by a long shot.
Thoughts:When I was initially reading it, I wasn’t that impressed. I have always heard really good things about this story and so I was a little surprised. After I finished however and got to thinking about it, I realized it was a lot more impressive than I first thought it was writing about love and life of us all. Very good!

“Well, I guess that don’t any harm, either. Whereever you come near the human race, there’s layers and layers of nonsense….” (309)

“There’s something way down deep that’s eternal about every human being….You know as well as I do that the dead don’t stay interested in us living people for very long. Gradually, gradually, they lose hold of the earth…and the ambitions they had…and the pleasures they had…and the things they suffered…and the people they loved. They get weaned away from the earth-that’s the way I put it-weaned away.

And they stay here while the earth part of ‘em burns away, burns out: and all that time they slowly get indifferent to what’s goin’ on in Grover’s Corner.

They’re waitin’. They’re waitin’ for something that they feel is comin’. Something important, and great. Aren’t they waitin’ for the eternal part in them to come out clear?” (309)

“Live people don’t understand, do they?”
“No, dear-not very much.
“They’re sort of shut up in little boxes, aren’t they.” (311)

“Do any human beings ever realize life while they live it?- every, every minute?
“No. {pause} The saints and poets, maybe- they do some.
I’m ready to go back.

Monday, October 22, 2007

Toni Morrison's Song of Solomon




Toni Morrison’s Song of Solomon
Begin: 10/12/07
End: 10/21/07
Quality: Ten out of Ten.
Reason: Reading Plan.
Genre: Fiction. African-American Fiction. Literature.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1977.
Fog Index: N/A
Flesch Index: N/A
Flesch-Kincaid Index: N/A
Complex Words:N/A.
Number: A Few.
Synopsis: Well, it’s really quite a number of stories, now isn’t it. The main one is Milkman and his lack of identity but that doesn’t really do justice to the story, not by a long shot.
Thoughts: What to say about this book? Well, first of all, can I just take a moment and fucking bow down before Toni Morrison? She is seriously the best damn living writer we have. A fucking national treasure.

This is my favorite of any of Ms. Morrison’s novels. I know that Beloved is heralded as the cat’s meow and I do not for a minute doubt that it deserve’s that title. I love that book, I really do, but it’s just so damn depressing. While Song of Solomon is very uplifting and, I think, much more lyrical. Plus, it is quite a bit more accessible than, probably, any of Morrison’s other novels. The characters are just so alive and remarkable. Pilate. Who is not completely mesmerized by Pilate? She appears in this novel and everyone else just pales in comparison. She is one of those characters that I want in my life, that I really feel is an old friend because I have spent so much time not only reading the novel but also thinking about her. Macon, Ruth, Dr. Foster, Circe. Guitar. Sing. Solomon. These are all characters that will stay with you for a long time, even those whom the book only touches on briefly.

Now, there are a couple aspects of the story that I would very much like to delve into for a moment. The first issue is that of names. This is such a hugely important aspect of this book.
We have the difference between what the official names for places are such as Mercy Hospital and Mains Avenue. Yet, the oral tradition of the African Americans in the town refers to it as No Mercy hospital and Mains Avenue as Not Doctor Street. The locals know the reality and call it like they see it. We have the names that the first Macon Dead populated his farm with. He named it Lincoln’s Heaven. He names the animals in the same manner. The names of places are accurate “namings” of the reality of these places.

Then there is what people are named, either by their parents, by bureaucrats or by the community. Macon Dead does not allow anyone to speak the name of his wife. He also does not use his real name of Jake, instead he goes by the name that the “drunk yankee” gave him. And we see how happy and completed Milkman becomes when he discovers the names of his grandparents. We should not forget, especially in a Toni Morrison novel, the mythology of names. The power one gets from knowing someone’s true name. We also have Pilate who carries around her name in a snuff box, the name that her illiterate father wrote out for the midwife. Is it coincidence that First Corinthians is the sister who decides to love considering that is the epistle most concerned with love?

We have the names that were given to Milkman and Guitar, not their real names.
“What’s your trouble? You don’t like your name?”
“No.” Milkman let his head fall to the back of the booth. “No, I don’t like my name.”
“Let me tell you something, baby. Niggers get their names the way they get everything else- the best way they can. The best way they can.”

The other major thing that I wished to talk about was flying. The epigraph of the novel is…
“The fathers may soar / And the children may know their names” The novel then opens on Robert Smith’s attempt at flight. It is a theme that while I would not say runs through the novel is nevertheless extremely important to the novel. Flight is a means to escape(overstating the obvious, I know) and we see various characters escaping their oppression. Solomon, Milkman (although that can be questioned) Robert Smith, Pilate. Pilate can fly while her feet touch the ground, Milkman notes at one point. Solomon flies off, leaving his children and wife bereft of a father, and goes back to African, escaping the oppression of slavery.



“He walked there now-strutted is the better word, for he had a high behind and an athlete’s stride-thinking of names. Surely, he thought, he and his sister had some ancestor, some lithe young man with onyx skin and legs as straight as cane stalks, who had a name that was real. A name given to him at birth with love and seriousness. A name that was not a joke, nor a disguise nor a brand name. But who this lithe young man was, and where his cane stalk legs carried him from or to, could never be known. No. nor his name. His own parents, in some mood of perverness or resignation, had agreed to abidge by a naming done to them by somebody who couldn’t have cared less. Agreed to take and pass on to all their issue this heavy name scrawled in perfect thoughtlessness by a drunken Yankee in the Union Army. A literal slip on the pen handed to his father on a piece of paper and which he handed to his only son, and his son likewise handed on to his; Macon Dead who begat a second Macon Dead .”

“Gimme hate, Lord,” he whimpered. “I’ll take hate any day. But don’t give me love. I can’t take no more love, Lord. I can’t carry it. Just like Mr. Smith. He couldn’t carry it. It’s too heavy. Jesus, you know, You know all about it. Ain’t it heavy? Jesus? Ain’t love heavy? Don’t you see, Lord? Your own son couldn’t carry it. If it killed Him, what you think it’s gonna do to me? Huh? Huh?” (26)

“And heard as well her shouts when the baby, who they had believed was dead also, inched its way headfirst out of a still, silent and indifferent cave of flesh, dragging her own cord and her own afterbirth behind her. But the rest was true. Once the new baby’s lifeline was cut, the cord stump shriveled, fell off and left no trace of having ever existed” (28)

“It was becoming a habit-this concentration on things behind him. Almost as though there were no future to be had.” (35)

“Taken apart, it looked alright. Even better than all right. But it lacked coherence, a coming together of the features into a total self. It was all very tentative, the way he looked, like a man around a corner of someplace he is not supposed to be, trying to make up his mind whether to go forward or to turn back. The decision he made would be extremely important, but the way in which he made the decision would be careless, haphazard and uninformed.” (70)

“The lengths to which lost love drove men and women never surprised them. They had seen women pull their dresses over their heads and howl like dogs for lost love. And men who set in doorways with pennies in their mouths for lost love. ‘Thank god,’ they whispered to themselves, thank god I ain’t never had one of them graveyard loves.” (128)

“Two growed-up women talkin’ about a man like he was a house or needed one. He ain’t a house, he’s a man, and whatever he need, don’t none of you got it.” (138)

“I don’t remember my mother because she died before I was born” (141)

“So I knew right away what he meant cause he was right there when we did it. He meant that if you take a life, the you own it. You responsible for it. You can’t get rid of nobody by killing them. They still there, and they know yours now.” (208)

“Stop sniveling,” it said. “Stop picking around the edges of the world. Take advantage, and if you can’t take advantage, take disadvantage. We live here. On this planet, in this nation, in this county right here. Nowhere else! We got a home in this rock, don’t you see! Nobody starving in my home; nobody crying in my home, and if I got a home you got one too! Grab it! Grab this land! Take it. Hold it, mybrothers, make it, my brothers, shake it, squeeze it, turn it , twist it, beat it, kick it, kiss it, whip it, stomp it, dig it, plow it, seed it, reap it, rent it, buy it, sell it, own it, build it, mutiply it, and pass it on, can you hear me? Pass it on.” (235)

“You think because he doesn’t love you that you are worthless. You think because he doesn’t want you anymore that he is right- that his judgement and opinion of you are correct. If he throws you out, then you are garbage. You think he belongs to you because you want to belong to him. Hagar, don’t. It a bad word, ‘belong’. Especially when you put it with somebody you love. Love shouldn’t be like that. Did you ever see the way the clouds love a mountain? They circle all around it; sometimes you can’t even see the mountain for the clouds. But you know what? You go up top and what do you see? His head. The clouds never cover the head. His head pokes through, because the clouds let him; they don’t wrap him up. They let him keep his head up high, free, with nothing to hide him or bind him. Hear me, Hagar?” He spoke to her as he would to a very young child. “You can’t own a human being. You can’t lose what you don’t own. Suppose you did own him. Could you really love somebody who was absolutely nobody without you? You really want somebody like that? Somebody who falls apart when you walk out the door? You don’t, do you? And neither does he? You’re turning over your whole life to him. Your whole life, girl. And if it means so little to you that you can just give it away, hand it to him, then why should it mean any more to him? He can’t value you more than you value yourself.” (305)

Thursday, October 18, 2007

William Shakespeare's Macbeth




William Shakespeare’s Macbeth
Begin: 10/14/07
End: 10/18/07
Quality: Eight out of Ten.
Reason: Reading Plan.
Genre: Fiction. Drama. Classics.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1623.
Fog Index: 6.7/92% are harder
Flesch Index: 75.4/90% are harder
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 5.0/93% are harder
Complex Words: 8%/86% have more.
Number: A Few.
Synopsis: Macbeth does very well in a Scottish war. Three witches prophecy that he will be thane of Cawdor and then king. When he is given the title of thane of Cawdor, Macbeth gets to thinking and with his wife’s help, kills the King, thus becoming king. And thus the tragedy begins.
Thoughts: What to say about Macbeth? What a fool, a bloody fool! And it’s so weird, he’s so concerned about regicide and killing such a good man in the beginning and then he makes this warped, twisted tyrant who kills friends and children. His wife, who started off more ambitious than him, just loses her damn mind. Very interesting story. Loyalty to both his king and to his friends is tossed out the window for ambition. Macbeth suffers, Scotland suffers, and everyone suffers, except maybe the witches who could give a shit.

“Whither shall I fly?/I have done no harm. But I remember now/I am in this earthly world, where to do harm/Is often laudable, to do good sometime/accounted dangerous folly. Why then, alas,/Do I put up that womanely defense,/to say I have done no harm?” (IV.ii. 72-75)

“Boundless intemperance/In nature is a tyranny; it hath been/th’ untimely emptying of the happy throne,/And fall of many kings. But fear not yet/to take upon you what is your: you may/convey your pleasures in a spacious plenty/and yet seem cold, the time you may so hoodwink./We have willing dames enough. There cannot be/that vulture in you,to devour so many/as Will to greatness dedicate themselves,/finding it so inclinded” (IV.iii. 67-75)

“Tomorrow, and tomorrow and tomorrow/creeps in this petty pace from day to day,/to the last syllable of recorded time;/and all our yesterdays have lighted fools/the way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!/Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player/That struts and frets his hour upon the stage/ and then is heard no more. It is a tale/told by an idiot, full of sound and fury/signifying nothing.” (V.v. 17-28)

Friday, October 12, 2007

J.R.R. Tolkien's Return of the King

J.R.R. Tolkien's Return of the King
Begin: 10/06/07
End: 10/11/07
Quality: Ten out of Ten.
Reason: Reading Plan.
Genre: Fiction. Novel. Fantasy. Epic. Classic.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1954.
Fog Index: 7.5/85% are harder
Flesch Index: 80.7/96% are harder
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 5.6/85% are harder
Complex Words: 4%/92% have more.
Number: Countless.
Synopsis: This is the final book in the Lord of the Rings trilogy. The first half of the book deals with the war on Gondor while the second half deals with Frodo and Sam making it to Mount Doom and the outcomes of the War of the Ring.
Thoughts: A little sad it’s all over. Impressive as always. I kept finding little refrences to the fact that Sauron didn’t really have willing servants but slaves that he bent to his will which is interesting spin on things. Orcs not being evil creatures as much as just tools of Sauron. I was also extremely fascinated with Saruman in this reading. I just can’t figure this fucker out, was he that power mad and disturbed? They gave him chance after chance. How can that man have that much pride?


“Too often have I hear of duty,” she cried. “But am I not of the House of Eorl, a shieldmaiden and not a dry-nurse? I have waited on faltering feet long enough. Since they falter no longer, it seems, may I not now spend my life as I will.”

“What do you dear, lady?” he said.
“A cage,” she said. “To stay behind bars, until use and old age accept them, and all chance of doing great deads is gone beyond recall or desire.” (767)

“I pity even his slaves” (795)

“But who knows what she spoke to the darkness, alone, in the bitter watches of the night, when all her life seemed shrinking, and the walls of her bower closing in about her, a hutch to trammel some wild thing in?” (849)

“Yet it is not our part to master all the tides of the world, but to do what is in us for the succor of those years wherein we are set, uprooting the evil in the fields that we know, so that those who live after may have clean earth to till. What weather they shall have is not ours to rule.” (861)

“for he had few servants but many slaves of fear.” (880)

“But far worse than all such perils was the ever approaching threat that beat upon them as they went: the dreadful menace of the Power that waited, brooding in deep thought and sleepless malice behind the dark veil about its throne. Nearer and nearer it drew, looming blacker, like the oncoming of a wall of night at the last end of the world.” (914)

“Then suddenly, as before under the eaves of Emyn Muil, Sam saw these two rivals with other vision. A crouching shadow, scarcely more than the shadow of a living thing, a creature now wholly ruined and defeated, yet filled with a hideous lust and rage; and before it stood stern, untouchable now by pity, a figure robed in white, but at its breast it held a wheel of fire. Out of the fire there spoke a commanding voice.
‘Begoner and trouble me no more! If you touch me ever again, you shall be cast yourself into the fire of Doom.” (922)

“and even at that moment all the hosts of Mordor trembled, doubt clutched their hearts, their laughter failed, their hands shook and their limbs were loosed. The Power that drove them on and filled them with hate and fury was wavering, its will was removed from them; and now looking in the eyes of their enemies they saw a deadly light and were afraid.” (927)

“But if you would know, I am turning aside soon. I am going to have a long talk with Bombadil; such a talk as I have not had in all my time. He is a moss-gatherer, and I have been a stone doomed to rolling. But my rolling days are ending, and now we shall have much to say to one another.” (974)

Tuesday, October 9, 2007

J.R.R. Tolkien's The Two Towers

J.R.R. Tolkien's Two Towers
Begin: 09/30/07
End: 10/05/07
Quality: Ten out of Ten.
Reason: Reading Plan.
Genre: Fiction. Novel. Fantasy. Epic. Classic.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1954.
Fog Index: 7.5/85% are harder
Flesch Index: 80.7/96% are harder
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 5.6/85% are harder
Complex Words: 4%/92% have more.
Number: Countless.
Synopsis: This story continues right after Fellowship of the Ring. It’s essentially two different books. The first one details Aragon, Gimli and Legolas chasing after Merry and Pippin who have been captured by Orcs. They then get caught up in the war between Saraman and the Rohan while Merry and Pippin get involved in the Ents battles against Saraman. The second book details Frodo and Sam’s journey to Mordor. They get lost trying to make their way to Mordor and capture Gollum who serves as their guide into Mordor.
Thoughts: Really good. This book, well the series, just sucks me in every time I read it. I lost my sheet with all my little page numbers for quotes but here is the only one I have.

“It was Sam’s first view of a battle of Men against men, and he did not like it much. He was glad that he could not see the dead face. He wondered what the man’s name was and where he came from; and if he was really evil of heart, or what lies or threats had led him on the long march from his home; and if he would not really have stayed there in peace” (646)

I did have a few thoughts on re-reading this novel.

The orcs weren’t necessarily evil. They didn’t even want to fight for sauron, they were more like slaves that were just doing their master’s bidding. They seemed to hate the Nazgul.

The scene where Frodo and Sam are at the crossroads and they see the statues head on the ground with the graffiti on it and the light is shining on it, giving it a crown. I thought this was profoundly foreshadowing the return of Aaragon to the throne of Gondor.

I also find it sad that in today’s world we have lost a lot of levels of friendship. The relationship between Sam and Frodo is not sexual in the least. They are not homosexuals. And yet that is what everyone is going to read them as in today’s world and that’s kinda sad. I mean, I’m all for revealing homosexual subtext if it’s there being a huge fag myself but sometimes it’s not there and we read it anyway and I kept finding myself doing just that and then getting annoyed. J.R.R. Tolkien seems to divorce sexuality from any of his characters. I just don’t really see any of them displaying passion which is one of his few failings.

I also would like a fantasy novel where the domain of the evil lord is not a wasteland. What about an evil lord who rules a beautiful city or a prestigious mountainside or a virgin forest, nope, all the evil guys here have horrible ecological balance.

I also find that Peter Jackson’s vision has infiltrated my readings of the books, which is very sad but happens quite a bit with good film adaptations.

On another note, I was reading this at work the other day and when I told two guests that I read it every year, they made fun of me. Evidently, they think it’s stupid to read the same books over and over again. I tried to explain that you can get something else out of a book every time that you read it but they weren’t having it. It irritated me. Honestly. I feel that some books are extremely rich, they have layers upon layers of meaning and that you can get something else every time that you read them that unlike say, a Danielle Steele novel, you are going to notice different things every time you read it. Plus, it’s also like hanging out with old friends again.

Sunday, September 30, 2007

J.R.R. Tolkien's Fellowship of the Ring







J.R.R. Tolkien's Fellowship of the Ring
Begin: 09/22/07
End: 09/30/07
Quality: Ten out of Ten.
Reason: Reading Plan.
Genre: Fiction. Novel. Fantasy. Epic. Classic.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1954.
Fog Index: 8.1/82% are harder
Flesch Index: 78.2/94% are harder
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 6.2/81% are harder
Complex Words: 5%/91% have more.
Number: Countless.
Synopsis: Frodo leaves his home in the shire on Gandalf's order due to his possesion of the Ring which is being hunted by the servants of Sauron. He makes it to Rivendale and a great council is held to decide what to do with it. Nine people are chosen to try and take the Ring to Mount Doom to destroy the ring. Adventure ensues.
Thoughts: God, I forgot how much I loved this book. Really. It's been about two years or something like that. It's so much richer and more magestic than the movies. The problem is that I've watched the movies quiet a number of times in between readings and it has a tendency to take over but the book is so bad ass. It's literature. It's not some cheesy fantasy novel. It's a novel with universal themes and things to say.

Monday, September 24, 2007

A.S. Byatt's Possession


A.S. Byatt’s Possession: A Romance.
Begin: 09/18/07
End: 09/21/07
Quality: Ten out of Ten.
Reason: Unread. Random.
Genre: Fiction. Novel. Literary Fiction.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1990
Fog Index: 10.6/70% are harder
Flesch Index: 63.8/72% are harder
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 8.5/68% are harder
Complex Words: 10%/74% have more.
Number: First.
Synopsis: Roland and Maud are two academics who study the fictional Victorian poets, R.H. Ash and Christabel LaMotte. Roland discovered a half-written letter and they become co-conspirators in discovering the truth. Byatt uses the on-going story as well as letters, journals and poems to tell this multi-layered story.
Thoughts: This novel really wowed me. I tried reading it a few months ago and just couldn’t get into it but this time, I couldn’t put it down. It was so engaging, enthralling and captivating. I believe some of this is due to the fact that I was a literature major and academic stuff just gets me all excited. I was totally mesmerized by all aspects of this novel. I know some people had a problem with say the Victorian love letters or the sheer amount of information but I ate it up and wanted more. And this book really made me think, which always makes me infinitely happy.

I thought that the ending was a little too neat but that was really my only complaint. Love it. Here’s some quotes….

“’I was avoiding the word, because that precisely isn’t the point. We are so knowing. And all we’ve found out, is primitive sympathetic magic. Infantile polymorphous perversity. Everything relates to us and so we’re imprisoned in ourselves- we can’t see things. And we paint everything with this metaphor-‘
‘You are very cross with Leonora.’
‘She’s very good. But I don’t want to see through her eyes. It isn’t a matter of her gender and my gender. I just don’t.’
Maud considered. She said, ‘In every age, there must be truths people can’t fight- whether or not they want to, whether or not they will go on being truths in the future. We live in the truth of what Freud discovered. Whether or not we like it. However we’ve modified it. We aren’t really free to suppose-to imagine-he could possibly have been wrong about human nature. In particulars,, surely-but not on the large plan-‘” (276)

“‘I was thinking last night-about what you said about our generation and sex. We see it everywhere. As you say. We are very knowing. We know all sorts of other things, too.- about how there isn’t a unitary ego-how we’re made up of conflicting, interacting systems of things- and I suppose we believe that? We know we are driven by desire, but we can’t se it as they did, can we? We never say the word Love, do we- we know it’s a suspect ideological construct- especially Romantic Love-so we have to make a real effort of imagination to know what it felt like to be them, believing in these things- Love- themselves- that what they did mattered-‘”

“Things had changed between them nevertheless. They were children of a time and culture that mistrusted love, “in love”, romantic love, romanince in toto, and which nevertheless in revenge, proliferated sexual language, linguistic sexuality, analysis, dissection, deconstruction, exposure. They were theoretically knowing; they knew about phallocracy and penisneid, punctuation, puncturing and penetration, about polymorphous and polysemous perversity, orality, good and bad breasts, clitoral tumescence, vesicle persecution, the fluids, the solids, the metaphors for these, the systems of desire and damage, infantile greed and oppression and transgression, the iconography of the cervix asnd the imagery of the expanding and contracting Body, desired, attacked, consumed, feared.” (458)

“And yet, natures such as Roland’s are at their most alert and heady when reading is violently yet steadily alive. (What an amazing word “heady” is, en passant, suggesting both acute sensuous alertness and its opposite, the pleasure of the brain as opposed to the viscera-though each is implicated in the other, as we know very well, with both, when they are working)”

Thursday, September 20, 2007

William Shakespeare's Taming of the Shrew




William Shakespeare’s Taming of the Shrew
Begin: 09/14/07
End: 09/20/07
Quality: Four out of Ten.
Reason: Reading Plan.
Genre: Drama.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1593
Fog Index: 8.8/82% are harder
Flesch Index: 66.5/77% are harder
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 6.2/55% are harder
Complex Words: 13%/55% have more.
Number: Fifth?
Synopsis: I think the title bears it out very well. The basic story (ignoring the opening induction) is that Baptista has two daughters. One of them is a bitch and the other is a beauty. He refuses to let Bianca(the beauty) be courted until Kate(the bitch) is married off. Biance’s would be courtiers then find a suitor for Kate. Petruchio accepts the challenge, mainly because he wants a rich wife. He ends up marrying Kate and “tames” her. Bianca is then married off to Lucentio.
Thoughts: I have such a love/hate relationship with this play. I have always really liked the beginning and then it annoys me. I don’t want Kate to be tamed. I like when she’s a shrewish bitch. It’s funny. And it just doesn’t ever make sense to me that by refusing to let her sleep or eat, Petruchio would “tame” her. I am not even going to get into her monologue at the end of the play.

Monday, September 10, 2007

Charles Wheelan's Naked Economics



Charles Wheelan’s Naked Economics
Begin: 09/07/07
End: 09/10/07
Quality: Nine out of Ten
Reason: Random
Genre: Economics
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 2002
Fog Index: 13.8/43% are harder
Flesch Index: 49.4/48% are harder
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 11.1/43% are harder
Complex Words: 15%/48% have more.
Number: First.
Synopsis: This is basically just a book explaining basic economics.
Thoughts: Good! Very very good. I have been trying to get a firmer grasp on economics for a while. I have been reading the Wall Street Journal quite closely and such but things were still confusing me and I have to say that this book really did the trick. I gave me a very firm grasp of economics and really made a lot of political and public policy decisions make much better sense.

Thursday, September 6, 2007

Sharon Penman's Prince of Darkness



Sharon Penman’s Prince of Darkness.
Begin: 08/23/07
End: 09/01/07
Quality: Four out of Ten.
Reason: Random.
Genre: Historical Fiction. Mystery.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 2005.
Fog Index: 9.1
Flesch Index: 69.7
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 7.3
Complex Words: 8%
Number: First.
Synopsis: This is the fourth in the series. Justin De Quincy here is working for Prince John for a change and trying to uncover a plot to discredit John before Richard and Eleanor.
Thoughts: I used to really like her writing. This time it was annoying. I still enjoyed the book but I just felt it was a little too fluffy. Plus, Eleanor was barely in it. I got one very short scene! Damn it!

James Bowman's Honor:a a history



James Bowman’s Honor: a history
Begin: 08/20/07
End: 09/03/07
Quality: Three out of Ten.
Reason: Random.
Genre: Non-fiction. Military History. Social History.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 2006.
Fog Index: N/A
Flesch Index: N/A
Flesch-Kincaid Index: N/A
Complex Words: N/A
Number: First.
Synopsis: This book seeks to document the changes of honor over history in Western Civilization, he gives particular emphasis on how honor was perceived after World War 1. He also argues for a read option of a new honor system.
Thoughts: This was completely different than I thought it was going to be. He mostly just dealt with honor after World War I. I am not that interested in that. I was hoping for a more thorough explanation and analysis of honor especially in the middle ages. It was still plenty interesting. His ideas for a resurgence of honor were also especially fascinating. I do remember getting annoyed at some of his ideas at a few points but I can’t remember specifics because I read it mostly while on vacation.

Ernest Hemingway's The Sun Also Rises




Ernest Hemingway’s The Sun Also Rises
Begin: 09/03/07
End: 09/05/07
Quality: Six out of Ten.
Reason: Reading Plan.
Genre: Fiction.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1926
Fog Index: N/A
Flesch Index: N/A
Flesch-Kincaid Index: N/A
Complex Words: N/A
Number: First.
Synopsis: This story is about a group of expatriates who go down to Spain for a holiday. The main story centers on the narrator Jake Barnes.
Thoughts: I didn’t like it as much as I felt that I would or that I think that perhaps I should. Don’t get me wrong, it was good, it just wasn’t knock me down amazing and that’s what I want in a book. I want it to knock me the fuck over and me so amazed and flabbergasted that it’s all I can talk about. I didn’t get that here.

The Lost Generation aspect of the novel was also interesting. I not only just finish Honor A history which dealt with the repercussions of world war I but I have also heard that the lost generation is the closet in temperament to my own generation. I am not sure if I could see it here but it is interesting to think about.

Here's a great quote.

I'll Just talk around it. You know I feel rather damned good, Jake."
"You should"
"You know it makes one feel rather good deciding not to be a bitch."
"Yes."
"It's sort of what we have instead of God."
"Some people have God," I said. "Quite a lot"
"He never worked very well with me."
"Should we have another Martini?"

Saturday, August 4, 2007

Lady Chatterly

D.H. Lawrence’s Lady Chatterly’s Lover
Begin: ???
End: 08/03/07
Quality: Seven out of Ten.
Reason: Book Club.
Genre: Fiction.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1928.
Fog Index: 7.6
Flesch Index: 74.8
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 5.6
Complex Words: 8%
Number: Three?
Synopsis: It’s basically about a lover affair that develops between a ariscratic lady and the gamekeeper.
Thoughts: I really like this book. It was tough for me to get through since I haven’t really been reading lately and it’s the type of book that really makes me think about a lot of things.

There is so much to talk about here. The trouble is that since it took me so long to get through and since I am exhausted, I will leave at that.

Lady Chatterly

D.H. Lawrence’s Lady Chatterly’s Lover
Begin: ???
End: 08/03/07
Quality: Seven out of Ten.
Reason: Book Club.
Genre: Fiction.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1928.
Fog Index: 7.6
Flesch Index: 74.8
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 5.6
Complex Words: 8%
Number: Three?
Synopsis: It’s basically about a lover affair that develops between a ariscratic lady and the gamekeeper.
Thoughts: I really like this book. It was tough for me to get through since I haven’t really been reading lately and it’s the type of book that really makes me think about a lot of things.

There is so much to talk about here. The trouble is that since it took me so long to get through and since I am exhausted, I will leave at that.

Saturday, July 7, 2007




Toni Morrison’s Beloved
Begin: 06/27/07
End: 07/03/07
Quality: Ten out of Ten.
Reason: Reading Plan.
Genre: Fiction.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1987.
Fog Index: N/A
Flesch Index: N/A
Flesch-Kincaid Index: N/A
Complex Words: N/A.
Number: Four?
Synopsis: The story follows Sethe backwards and forwards in time as she confronts the ugly specter of slavery in her life and the life of her family. A young lady named Beloved shows up at her house one day and everything changes for the women at 124.
Thoughts: God, I can’t even begin to tell you how much I love and adore this book. It’s a masterpiece. I read her books and sometimes I think that Toni Morrison is god.

Toni Morrison’s Beloved. I am at a loss for words. Morrison writes with such a gift, with such style and lyrical magic. Her books captivate me like no one else can. I don’t know what it is about them. I am a gay cracker, why does this story of an ex-slave and her struggles move me so very much. Why do the writings of this black woman, albeit a brilliant black woman, move me so much? Does it even matter? Isn’t the important thing that I am moved? And I am. No living writer has the power of Toni Morrison’s pen for me.

This story is pretty brutal too. It is a rather bold and innovative look at the repercussions of slavery. The institution that haunts America even up to the present day. You read this story and wonder how Sethe could have done it but yet you also understand. I am not saying that this novel will let you experience the horrors of slavery but I think it will open your eyes better than many other books on the subject and can get you close as any modern day American can get to experience that horror.


“It’s gonna hurt, now,” said Amy. “Anything dead coming back to life hurts.” (35)

“Risky, thought Paul D, very risky. For a used-to-be-slave woman to love anything that much was dangerous, especially if it was her children she had settled on to love. The best thing, he knew, was to love just a little bit; everything, just a little bit, so when they broke its back, or shoved it in a croaker sack, well, maybe you’d have a little love left over for the next one.” (45)

“Spores of bluefern growing in the hollows along the riverbank float toward the water in silver-blue lines hard to see unless you are in or near them, lying right at the river’s edge when the sunshots are low and drained. Often they are mistook for insects-but they are seeds in which the whole generation sleeps confident of a future. And for a moment it is easy to believe each one has one-will become all of what is contained in the spore: will live out its days as planned. This moment of certainty last no longer than that; longer, perhaps, than the spore itself.” (84)


“Here,” she said, “in this place, we flesh; flesh that weeps, laughs; flesh that dances on bare feet in the grass. Love it. Love it hard. Yonder they do not love your flesh. They despite it. They don’t love your eyes; they’d just as soon pick them out. No more do they love the skin on your back. Yonder they flay it. And O my people they do not love your hands. Those they only use, tie, bind, chop off and leave empty. Love your hands! Love them. Raise them up and kiss them. Touch others with them, pat them together, stroke them on your face ‘cause they don’t love that either. You got to love it, you! And no, they ain’t in love with your mouth. Yonder, out there, they will not heed. What you scream from it they do not hear. What you put into it to nourish your body they will snatch away and give you leavins instead. No, they don’t love your mouth. You got to love it. Feet that need to rest and to dance; back that need support; shoulders that need arms, strong arms I’m telling you. And O my people, out yonder, hear me, they do not love your neck unnoosed and straight. So love your neck; put a hand on it, grace it, stroke it and hold it up. And all your inside parts that they’d just as soon slop for hogs, you got to love them. The dark, dark liver-love it, love it and the beat and beating heart, love that too. More than eyes or feet. More than lungs that have yet to draw free air. More than your lifeholding womb and your life-giving private parts, hear me now, love your heart. For this is the prize.” Saying no more, she stood up then and danced with her twisted hip the rest of what her heart had to say while the others opened their mouths and gave her the music. Long notes held until the four part harmony was perfect enough for their deeply loved flesh.” (88-89)

“Suspended between the nastiness of life and the meanness of the dead, she couldn’t get interested in leaving life or living it, let alone the fright of two creeping-off boys. Her past had been like her present—intolerable—and since she knew death was anything but forgetfulness, she used the little energy left her for pondering color.” (3-4)
“For they understood the source of the outrage as well as they knew the source of light.” (4)
“‘We have a ghost in here,’ she said…. ‘So I hear,’ he said. ‘But sad, your mama said. Not evil.’ ‘No sir…not evil. But not sad either.’ ‘What then?’ ‘Rebuked. Lonely and rebuked….’ ‘I don’t know about lonely….Mad, maybe, but I don’t see how it could be lonely spending every minute with us like it does.’” (13)
“‘I got a tree on my back and a haint in my house, and nothing in between but the daughter I am holding in my arms. No more running—from nothing. I will never run from another thing on this earth. I took one journey and I paid for the ticket, but let me tell you something, Paul D. Garner: It cost too much! Do you hear me? It cost too much.” (15)
“What she called the nastiness of life was the shock she received upon learning that nobody stopped playing checkers just because the pieces included her children.” (23)
“I was talking about time. It’s so hard for me to believe in it. Some things go. Pass on. Some things just stay. I used to think it was my rememory. You know. Some things you forget. Other things you never do….” (35-36).
“Listen up. Let me tell you something. A man ain’t a goddamn ax. Chopping, hacking, busting every goddamn minute of the day. Things get to him. Things he can’t chop down because they’re inside.” (69)
“Daily life took as much as she had. The future was sunset; the past something to leave behind. And if it didn’t stay behind, well, you might have to stomp it out. Slave life; freed life—every day was a test and a trial. Nothing could be counted on in a world where even when you were a solution you were a problem.” (256)

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Khaled Hosseini's Kite Runner



Khaled Hosseini's The Kite Runner
Begin: 06/19/07
End: 06/26/07
Quality: Four out of Ten.
Reason: Unread. Recomendation.
Genre: Fiction.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 2003
Fog Index: 7.1/88% are harder.
Flesch Index: 73.7/88% are harder.
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 5.5/86% are harder.
Complex Words: 7/88% have more.
Number: First.
Synopsis: Well, it starts off as the story of two boyhood friends in Kabul and then follows Amir's life as he travels to America and makes a life for himself before he is pulled back into his past life in Afghanistain.
Thoughts: Well, I started off really liking it. It was really sweet and poigant story of two boys growing up in Kabul but then Amir did something which so completly disgusted and enraged me, that I ended up hating him. I don't want to give it away but I found him to be quite detestable. I finished the book. It was okay. I thought that the begining was quite magical but that my hatred of Amir never really let me enjoy the rest of the book. Plus, I thought some of it was quite obvious and cliched. And to further prove this point..."A creative writing teacher at San Jose State used to say about cliche: "avoid them like the plague." Then he'd laugh at his own joke. The class laughed with him, but I always thought cliches got a bum rap. Because, often, they're dead on. But the aprness of the cliched saying is overshadowed by the nature of the saying as a cliche."

Thursday, June 21, 2007

David Eddings' The Belgariad



David Eddings' The Belgariad
Begin: 06/13/07
End: 06/18/07
Quality: Ten out of Ten
Reason: Comfort Reading.
Genre: Fiction. Fantasy.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1982
Fog Index: 7.8/87% are harder.
Flesch Index: 73.4/87% are harder.
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 5.8/88% are harder.
Complex Words: 8/82% have more.
Number: Countless.
Synopsis: It's your basic fantasy story. Garion is a farm boy living with his Aunt Pol. They leave in a hurry and get caught up in a magical adventure to reclaim the Orb of Aldur and save the west from Torak.
Thoughts: I was feeling kinda low so so I decided to re-read this series. I love it. I am a little embarrased as it is not exactly literature. It's pretty cheesey and follows the general pattern of fanstay novels. The thing is that I read this story when I was in sixth grade for the first time and constantly come back to it. I know this characters. I love this characters. They are my friends, old old friends. And one cannot live on Shakespeare alone, nor on Morrison alone. Plus, I haven't really been reading that much lately so I figured I needed something light.

Friday, June 8, 2007

William J. Mann's Kate: The Woman who was Hepburn

William J. Mann’s Kate: The Woman Who Was Hepburn.
Begin: 06/01/07
End: 06/07/07
Quality: Nine out of Ten
Reason: It’s Kate!
Genre: Biography. Cinema.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 10/2006
Fog Index:.N/A
Flesch Index: N/A
Flesch-Kincaid Index: N/A
Complex Words: N/A
Number: First
Synopsis: This is basically just the newest biography of Hepburn. This was goes into very explicit detail over her sexuality and the way in which she shaped her own image.
Thoughts: Damn. It was good. It was also a little disheartening. He dispelled more than a few myths about this woman that I love so very much. I always liked the idea of her and Spencer Tracey’s love affair. It was so romantic and scandalous.
I also liked that it was so very thorough. I mean, it is like a six hundred page tome and it details almost every aspect of her life. Incredible!

Saturday, June 2, 2007

Jesse Archer'



Jesse Archer’s You Can Run
Begin: 05/30/07
End: 06/01/07
Quality: Nine out of Ten
Reason: It’s Jesse Archer.
Genre: Queer Studies. Travel Literature. Non-Fiction.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 2007.
Fog Index:.
Flesch Index:
Flesch-Kincaid Index:
Complex Words:
Number: First
Synopsis: This book follows the wacky and hysterical adventures of the author through South America.
Thoughts: God, this was so damn funny. I would be on the bus or the train and just laughing out loud uncontrollably. I got some funny looks for this book. It was so damn amazing. Archer has some very keen observations about so many facets of not only American life but also life in south America as well as about gay men. This book was really amazing.



“As a teacher I discover many different ways to express many different things, and yet in the puzzling language of the heart there is so much incapable of communicating, so many elusive, ineluctable feelings you can’t pin down with so inadequate a function as speech, and instead they are articulated through unforgettably bizarre fucking behavior.” (149)

Thursday, May 31, 2007

William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet




William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet
Begin: 05/29/07
End: 05/31/07
Quality: Ten out of Ten
Reason: Reading Plan.
Genre: Classics. Drama. Tragedy.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1623.
Fog Index: 6.6/93% are harder.
Flesch Index: 77.2/92% are harder.
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 4.7/94% are harder.
Complex Words: 8%/85% have more.
Number: Numerous.
Synopsis: As if everyone doesn’t know this story!!
Thoughts:
I am so glad I chose this play for my Shakespeare this month. Wow. After reading, I don’t know how many problem plays, this was a breeze. I forgot how good it was. Although I did have the problem of relating the action in my head to the Romeo and Juliet movie with Leonardo DiCaprio and Claire Danes. Nevertheless, I really do love this play. I mean some of the lines are just so mesmerizing. And it really is such a beautiful play. I find that some of the lines and some of the action seem to be a little bit extra but that is really just the era I live in.

Really-Really Good.



True, I talk of dreams,
Which are the children of an idle brain,
Begot of nothing but vain fantasy,
Which is as thin of substance as the air
And more inconstant than the wind, who wooes
Even now the frozen bosom of the north,
And, being anger'd, puffs away from thence,
Turning his face to the dew-dropping south.

O, she doth teach the torches to burn bright!
It seems she hangs upon the cheek of night
Like a rich jewel in an Ethiope's ear;
Beauty too rich for use, for earth too dear!
So shows a snowy dove trooping with crows,
As yonder lady o'er her fellows shows.
The measure done, I'll watch her place of stand,
And, touching hers, make blessed my rude hand.
Did my heart love till now? forswear it, sight!
For I ne'er saw true beauty till this night.

ROMEO
[To JULIET] If I profane with my unworthiest hand
This holy shrine, the gentle fine is this:
My lips, two blushing pilgrims, ready stand
To smooth that rough touch with a tender kiss.
JULIET
Good pilgrim, you do wrong your hand too much,
Which mannerly devotion shows in this;
For saints have hands that pilgrims' hands do touch,
And palm to palm is holy palmers' kiss.
ROMEO
Have not saints lips, and holy palmers too?
JULIET
Ay, pilgrim, lips that they must use in prayer.
ROMEO
O, then, dear saint, let lips do what hands do;
They pray, grant thou, lest faith turn to despair.
JULIET
Saints do not move, though grant for prayers' sake.
ROMEO
Then move not, while my prayer's effect I take.
Thus from my lips, by yours, my sin is purged.
JULIET
Then have my lips the sin that they have took.
ROMEO
Sin from thy lips? O trespass sweetly urged!
Give me my sin again.
JULIET
You kiss by the book.

But, soft! what light through yonder window breaks?
It is the east, and Juliet is the sun.
Arise, fair sun, and kill the envious moon,
Who is already sick and pale with grief,
That thou her maid art far more fair than she:
Be not her maid, since she is envious;
Her vestal livery is but sick and green
And none but fools do wear it; cast it off.
It is my lady, O, it is my love!
O, that she knew she were!
She speaks yet she says nothing: what of that?
Her eye discourses; I will answer it.
I am too bold, 'tis not to me she speaks:
Two of the fairest stars in all the heaven,
Having some business, do entreat her eyes
To twinkle in their spheres till they return.
What if her eyes were there, they in her head?
The brightness of her cheek would shame those stars,
As daylight doth a lamp; her eyes in heaven
Would through the airy region stream so bright
That birds would sing and think it were not night.
See, how she leans her cheek upon her hand!
O, that I were a glove upon that hand,
That I might touch that cheek!

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Chogyam Trungpa's The Myth of Freedom and the Way of Meditation




Chogyam Trungpa’s The Myth of Freedom and the Way of Meditation
Begin: 05/9/07
End: 05/29/07
Quality: Seven out of Ten
Reason: Random.
Genre: Eastern Philosophy. Religion. Tibetan Buddhism.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1976.
Fog Index: 13.3/47% are harder.
Flesch Index: 52.8/52% are harder.
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 10.2/54% are harder.
Complex Words: 16%/45% have more.
Number: First.
Synopsis: Trungpa talks about the meaning of freedom and how our preconceptions, attitudes and spiritual practices can become chains and bind us. He also talks about the uses of meditation and the path of the Bodhasittva.
Thoughts:
I rather liked it. It was a little hard to get into, especially of late considering I have had no attention span, but I did enjoy it. My problem with books like this is that they say so much and I want to understand it all so very much but I simply cannot. I am never sure if I should be taking notes or somehow get a system for
Extracting the ideas into a concise form for later review but that would seriously take so long so for now I am just grabbing some quotes.

The other issue is just that I know a lot about Buddhism, I really just need to start meditating and stop fucking around.

Anyway, here’s the quotes.

“The practice of meditation is to see the transparency of this shield. But we cannot immediately start dealing with the basic ignorance itself; that would be like trying to push a wall down at once. If we want to take this wall down, we must take it down brick by brick; we start with immediately available material, a stepping stone. So the practice of meditation starts with the emotions and thoughts, particularly with the thought process.” (22)

“You do not try to use meditation techniques-prayer,mantra, visualization, rituals, breathing techniques- to create pleasure or to confirm your existence. You do not try to separate yourself from the technique, but you try to become the technique so that there is a sense of non-duality. Techinque is a way of imitating the style of non-duality. In the beginning a person uses technique as a kind of game because he is still imagining that he is meditating. But the techniques-physical feeling, sensations and breathing for instance- are very earthy and tend to ground a person.” (45)

“The in beginning the practice of meditation is just dealing with the basic neurosis of mind, the confused relationship between yourself and projections, your relationships to thoughts.” (46)

“So the intelligent way of working with emotions is to try and relate with their basic substance, the abstract quality of emotions, so to speak.” (67)

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Eugene O'Neill's Desire Under the Elms



Eugene O’Neill’s Desire Under the Elms.
Begin: 05/24/07
End: 05/29/07
Quality: Ten out of Ten
Reason: Modern Drama
Genre: Fiction. Drama. American Literature.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1924.
Fog Index: 8.6/82% are harder.
Flesch Index: 67.4/78% are harder.
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 7.5/76% are harder.
Complex Words: 7%/89% have more.
Number: Third.
Synopsis: Widower Ephraim Cabot brings home a new wife to his farm. His son, Eben buys the other two sons, Simeon and Peter, shares of the farm with money stolen from his father. Abbie, the new wife, and Eben begin an adulterous relationship and she has his baby. Abbie eventually kills the infant after a fight with Eben and then all their secrets come pouring out.
Thoughts:
So very good. Rich and intense. Dark, broody tragedy modeled on ancient greek tragedy but set in New England. It is seeped in biblical references. Very disturbing as well. The whole incestuous adulterous thing, and that’s not even getting into the whole oedipal issues that are strewn throughout this play.

“Hain’t the sun strong an’ hot? Ye kin feel it burnin’ into the earth-Nature=makin’ thin’s grow-bigger’n’bigger into somethin’ else-till ye’re jined with it-an’it’s your’n-but it owns ye,too-an’ makes ye grow bigger-like a tree-like them elums-Nature’ll beat ye, Eben. Ye might’s well own up t’ it fust’s last” (269) Abbie to Eben.

“God’s hard, not easy! God’s in the stones! Build my church on a rock-out o’ stones an’ I’ll be in them! That’s what He meant t’Peter!” (272)) Cabot.

Friday, May 25, 2007

Toni Morrison's Tar Baby





Toni Morrison’s Tar Baby
Begin: 05/20/07
End: 05/25/07
Quality: Ten out of Ten
Reason: Reading Plan.
Genre: African-American Literature. Fiction.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1981.
Fog Index: 7.1/91% are harder.
Flesch Index: 78.4/94% are harder.
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 5.0/93% are harder.
Complex Words: 7%/89% have more.
Number: Seventh.
Synopsis: The story begins with Son and his escape from his ship to a small Caribbean island. He eventually finds himself at the mansion of Valerian Street and creates all sorts of turmoil before starting a love affair with Jadine.
Thoughts: I am a complete idiot! Have I ever mentioned that? I have read this story before and I thought tar baby was a racial slur. I didn’t realize that it had a much deeper history. In the second of the Uncle Remus stories, Br’er Rabbit was entrapped by a doll made of tar and turpentine. The more he fought the tar-baby, the more entangled he became. It’s come to mean any sticky situation that is made worse by trying to solve it. The story stems from African myths involving Anasi. This puts a slightly different spin on the novel.

I have to say that I thoroughly enjoyed this novel. It did seem quite out of place in the Morrison canon. I can’t exactly pinpoint exactly why, perhaps the amount of dialogue or that it followed a more traditional or contemporary plot structure. I am not sure but I liked it.

I also thought quite a bit about what I was missing in reading this, and for that matter, any of Ms. Morrison’s novels. She writes novel geared towards African-Americans. She once said that “It seems to me that the novel is needed by African-Americans now in a way that it was not needed before... Parents do not sit around and tell their children those classical mythological, archetypal stories that we heard before. But new information has got to get out and there are several ways to do it. One is in the novel." I am aware, hyperaware oftentimes, that I am missing certain aspects of her work, that I am not quite digesting it all. And I got to thinking that is this due to some degree to the fact that I am a white male, despite the enormity of my faggotry. Or perhaps I am not old enough, wise enough, smart enough, or perhaps I’m just not supposed to get it all but that over time and multiple readings it will open up for me slowly and surely like other great works of literature. I mean if I can “get” every aspect when I read a book, why would I bother reading it again? Hell, why bother reading it the first time!




I often feel that if I could only fully understand Ms. Morrison’s works (or Fellini’s film, Blake poetry, Picasso’s painting, Faulkner’s Prose, ect) another world would open up to me like that Blake statement : ”if the doors of perception were cleansed everything would appear to man as it is, infinite."

Anyway. I am getting away from the novel at hand, Tar Baby. Wow. A lot of talk about and really not that much time. I have read a few things on the internet about it and was amazed at the amount of things that people saw in the novel that I simply didn’t. Jadine as a race traitor. Oh, I could see it but I simply don’t.
Tar Baby as a Marxist story. Again, I can see it but I think that Ms. Morrison’s novels are far too complex for things to be that simple.

The specific charge that really stuck in my mind was that Jadine was a tar baby meant to entrap Son (the rabbit) by Valerian Street (the farmer).

Isn’t that far too simple a reading? Isn’t the tar baby the complex relationship between human beings? Or am I universalizing things too much? The relationship of mutual dependence and deep emotional ties which are not always pretty to examine and generally hidden away. The tar baby of human beings living and working with one another in complex hierarchal situation involving race and gender and class and a million and one other differences to be worked out and worked on.

I also would like to point out the one portion of the novel that really quirked me. (if I may use quirk in that context) What was up with that shower that Son took? He went from being this horrible hobo looking creature to a beautiful beautiful Adonis like creature. That’s some fucking shower! Can I get one?

I have some quotes but will save them for another day since I left my book at home.

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Kenneth Grahame’s Wind in the Willows



Kenneth Grahame’s Wind in the Willows
Begin: 05/08/07
End: 05/15/07
Quality: Nine out of Ten
Reason: Random.
Genre: Children’s Literature.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1908
Fog Index: 10.1/72% are harder.
Flesch Index: 69.4/82% are harder.
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 8.2/70% are harder.
Complex Words: 7%/87% have more.
Number: Third?
Synopsis: This is the story of a group of anthomorphic animal friends, Rat, Badger, Mole and Toad.
Thoughts: I really liked this novel. I do remember this having more of a central plot which is not at all true. It’s a bit of a rambling work that is only connected by the characters but I still really enjoyed it. I especially liked when Pan made an appearance.

I thought the whole scene where Rat is practically hypnotized by the sailor rat to be rather weird. And I have to say, I was a little disappointed that Toad was not punished at all for all of his deviance. He just got off scott free. I don’t know how I feel about that since I thought he was a bit of an ass.

I guess that’s it for this one.

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Karen Karbo's How to Hepburn




Karen Karbo’s How to Hepburn
Begin: 05/10/07
End: 05/13/07
Quality: Eight out of Ten
Reason: Random.
Genre: Film. Non-fiction.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 04.07.2007
Fog Index: N/A
Flesch Index: N/A
Flesch-Kincaid Index: N/A
Complex Words: N/A
Number: First.
Synopsis: Weird little book. It’s basically reviewing Katharine’s life and culling life lessons from it.
Thoughts: I love it and I hated it. I loved it a lot more than I hated it. I thought that Karbo seemed to have a set guidelines and just kinda used Kate’s life as a model as opposed to looking at Kate’s life and getting the lesson from that. I did enjoy the overview of her life and it made me go and buy the Mann biography about how she was a lesbian.

I guess that’s all I got for this little book.

Tuesday, May 8, 2007

William Shakespeare



William Shakespeare’s Timon of Athens
Begin: 04/28/07
End: 05/07/07
Quality: Four out of Ten
Reason: Reading Plan.
Genre: Drama. Classics. Problem Plays.
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1623
Fog Index: 9.6/73% are harder.
Flesch Index: 62.9/72% are harder.
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 7.3/75% are harder.
Complex Words: 13%/57% are harder.
Number: First.
Synopsis: Timon of Athens is very generous to his friends, constantly giving gifts and getting people out of debt. Unfortunately, when his money runs out, no one will help him. He flees Athens and lives in a cave where he finds a large cache of gold. He gives this to Alcibiades to conquer Athens.
Thoughts: Why do I keep reading this damn problem plays? They just end up confuse the shit out of me. Fuck it, I am reading Midsummer Night’s Dream next. Now that is some good Shakespeare. This stuff is just tough to get through and figure out what the hell is going on.
I didn’t hate it. I just thought it was kinda weird and I had a hard time seeing where some of the characters were coming from.

I don’t really think I got much out of it. I had a few food quotes. I really enjoyed the character of Apemantus, the churlish philosopher. I may want to bring the word churlish back into everyday use. It is a fun word.

The play remind me, in some ways, of Nina Simone’s “No one knows you when your down.”

And I guess that is all that I have for the moment.

“What a sweep of vanity comes this way./They Dance? They are madwomen./ Like Madness is the glory of this life,/As this pomp shows to a little oil and root/We make ourselves fools to disport ourselves,/And spend our flatteries to drink those men/Upon whose age we void it up again/With poisonous spite and envy/who lives that’s not depraved or depraves?/Who dies that bears not one spurn to their graves/of their friends’ gift?/I should fear those that dance before me now/would one day stamp upon me. ‘T’as been done./ Men shut their doors against a setting dun.” (I.ii.134-147)

“I am Misanthropos and hate mankind./For thy part/I do wish thou wert a dog,/that I might love thee something.” (IV.iii.54-56)

“Spare your oaths:/I’ll trust to your conditions. Be whore still,/And he whose pious breath seeks to convert you, / Be strong in whore, allure him, burn him up;/ Let your close fire predominate his smoke / and Be no turncoats.” (IV.iii.139-145)

Monday, May 7, 2007

Toni Morrison's Jazz



Toni Morrison's Jazz
Begin: 04/29/07
End: 05/07/07
Quality: Seven out of Ten
Reason: Reading Plan.
Gene: Fiction.African American Fiction..
Original Language: English.
Date of Publication: 1992.
Fog Index: 8.2/85% are harder.
Flesch Index: 76.3/91% are harder.
Flesch-Kincaid Index: 6.2/86% are harder.
Complex Words: 6%/92% has more.
Number: First.
Synopsis: Joe Trace shoots his teenage lover, Dorcas. His wife tries to disfigure the girl at her funeral. This novel goes back and forth through time explaining the stories of not just, Joe, Violet and Dorcas but others as well.
Thoughts: Wow. I don’t know how she does it. I really am at such a loss when I read her books. Toni Morrison is just so fucking amazing. I mean really! The worlds and characters that she creates, the prose that she weaves seemingly out of magic and poetry.

Now, having said all of that, this was not my favorite Toni Morrison. I felt that it was a little fractured, a little more rambling than I would have liked. I do not know if this has anything to do with the fact that I am feeling a little spacey lately.

I guess that is my main problem with this work, too much going on. You had the main story with Violet, Joe and Dorcas but then their was Alice Manfred and the back stores of Violet and Joe and I just had a hard time keeping track. I also found the narration to be confusing. I wasn’t sure who it was. It wasn’t till the end of the book that I realized it was Toni Morrison herself, or at least I think so.

I would write more but I seem to have misplaced my brain. I feel bad since most of what I wrote is negative. And I really did like it but since my brain is gone, I’m going to give up the ghost.
Quotes:

“And when spring comes to the City people notice one another in the road; notice the strangers with whom they share aisles and tables and the space where intimate garments are laundered.” (117)

“I told you again that you were the reason Adam ate the apple and its core. That when he left Eden, he left a rich man. Not only he he have Eve, but he had the first taste of the first apple in the world in his mouth for the rest of his life. The very first to know what it was like. To bite it,. Bite it down. Hear the crunch and let the red peeling break into his heart.” (133)

“Don’t ever think I feel for you, or fell over you. I didn’t fall in love, I rose in it. I saw you and made up my mind. My mind. And I made up my mind to follow you too.” (135)

“Only now, he thought, now that I know I have a father, do I feel his absence: the place where he should have been and was not. Before, I thought everybody was one-armed, like me. Now I feel the surgery. The crunch of bone when it is sundered, the sliced flesh and the tubes of blood cut through, shocking the bloodrun and disturbing the nerves. They dangle and writhe. Singing pain. Waking me with the sound of itself, thrumming when I sleep so deeply it strangles my dreams away. There is nothing for it but to go away from where he is not to where he used to be and might be still. Let the dangle and the writhe see what it is missing; let the pain sing to the dirt where he stepped in the place where he used to be and might be still. I am not going to be healed, or to find the arm that was removed from me. I am going to freshen the pain, point it, so we both know what it is for.” (158)

“The girls have red lips and their legs whisper to each other through silk stockings. The red lips and the silk flash power. A power they will exchange for the right to be overcome, penetrated. The men at their side love it because, in the end, they will reach in, extend, get back behind that power, grab it and keep it still.” (182)

“What’s the world if you can’t make it up the way you want it?”
“The way I want it?”
“Yeah. The way you want it. Don’t you want it to be something more than what it is?”
“What’s the point? I can’t change it?”
“That’s the point. If you don’t, it will change you and it’ll be your fault cause you let it. I let it. And messed up my life.”
“Messed it up how?”
“forgot it”
“forgot?”
“forgot it was mine. My life. I just ran up and down the street wisahing I was somebody else.”
“Who? Who’d you want to be?”
“Not who so much as what. White. Light. Young again.” (208)

“I envy them their public love. I myself have only known it in secret, shared it in secret and longed, aw longed to show it-to be able to say out loud what they have no need to say at all: That I have loved only you, surrendered my whole self reckless to you and nobody else. That I want you to love me back and show it to me. That I love the way you hold me, how close you let me be to you. I like your fingers on and on, lifting, turning. I have watched your face for a long time now, and missed your eyes when you went away from me. Talking to you and hearing you answer-that’s the kick.” (229)